|
|
|

Taxes - The Heritage FoundationTaxes - The Heritage Foundation Proponents of raising taxes have offered many straw man arguments and myths to support their case. View Article - Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:00:00 -0400 As we celebrate Labor Day, let’s remember what makes this holiday possible in the first place: American workers. For the most part that means small business. View Article - Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 The CEO of Intel has joined the ranks of those labeling big government as the cause of our economic slump, not the solution. View Article - Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 President Obama has called for a huge tax increase to take effect on January 1, 2011. Instead of reducing spending, he proposes to raise taxes on a wide swath of taxpayers—including small businesses—despite the weak economic recovery. Congressional Democrats stand poised (immediately following the November elections) to endorse the President’s request and threaten to go much further. Proponents of letting the tax cuts expire—which would indeed be a tax hike—have offered a wide array of justifications for this wrongheaded policy. Heritage Foundation fiscal policy expert J. D. Foster wades through the myths and straw arguments to set the record straight. View Article - Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:29:00 -0400 Curtis Dubay discusses the merits of extending the Bush tax cuts, including cuts for the middle class. View Article - Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Bill Beach discusses whether a national tax holiday would encourage more lending. View Article - Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 The Economic Freedom Act, proposed by Representative Jim Jordan, would terminate the ineffective Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), and substitute a proven way to stimulate the economy: tax relief—from permanent repeal of the capital gains and death taxes to significant reductions in payroll taxes and the top corporate tax rate. Analysts at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis (CDA) conducted static and dynamic analyses of the act (H.R. 5029), finding that over the long term, dynamic economic effects would offset much of the cost of the tax relief. In the short term, the act would increase the deficit if it was not coupled with reductions in spending. This means a specific plan for spending cuts is imperative. The CDA analysts detail the economic and fiscal effects of the Economic Freedom Act’s spending and tax cuts. View Article - Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:30:00 -0400 Bill Beach discusses the possible outcomes of a flat tax. View Article - Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 J D Foster discusses the possibility of an American VAT. View Article - Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Imagine you are one of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s top political strategists. The polls show your party needs a game-changer, something that will transform what looks like a losing political hand into a winner. “I know,” you shout, “let’s push for a large tax increase on the ‘fortunate few’ — the 2 or 3 percent of the population with so much money they won’t even miss a few thousand bucks. The other 97 or 98 percent will feel no pain, and we’ll be able to call ourselves deficit hawks when all those billions start rolling in.” View Article - Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 President Obama wants to drastically raise taxes in January View Article - Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:57:00 -0400 The CBPP's critique is based on faulty economic analysis and fundamental misrepresentations. View Article - Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:00:00 -0400 Liberals in Congress have a plan to raise your taxes after the elections this fall, something they must do to continue feeding the Obama Administration’s spending addiction. Watch for them to act after the midterm elections under the cover of the report from the bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. View Article - Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Curtis Dubay returns to The Ed Show to discuss jobs and extending the Bush tax cuts. View Article - Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Curtis Dubay discusses renewing the Bush tax cuts to support economic growth. View Article - Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 The death tax: What does it kill? Who does it affect? It affects hundreds of thousands of small-business owners across the country—as well as their employees and community residents who benefit from the senior and day care centers, playgrounds, charities, and learning centers that are built or supported by small-business owners. Like water and sunlight in an ecosystem, small businesses provide sustenance essential to building and preserving communities. So high is the death tax that a large portion of heirs to small companies cannot afford to pay it after the business founder dies, and see themselves forced to sell to giant corporations—which have no personal ties to the communities of their new acquisitions, and thus no incentive to commit to local institutions. What does the death tax kill? The best of American life and civil society itself. The death tax is simply antithetical to the core of the American dream. View Article - Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:53:00 -0400 Millions of Americans face potential financial ruin because they bought homes they couldn't afford. Often, these homeowners were lured by initially low interest rates that provided the illusion of affordability. After a few years, these "teaser" rates reset upward, creating unaffordably high mortgage payments. View Article - Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Senator Jim DeMint cites Heritage research in his speech on preventing the renewal of the death tax. View Article - Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 2010 is the only year since 1916 in which heirs to an estate will not have to pay the dreaded death tax. Victory for small businesses? Not yet—due to a legal quirk, the death tax is scheduled to come back to life in 2011. Studies, statistics, and real life have shown again and again that the businesses and families burdened with the death tax often see themselves forced to cut back on benefits, investments, and employees. The death tax keeps new jobs from being created, hurting not just the affected businesses, but the economy as a whole. Because it is a tax on capital, the death tax destroys as many as 1.5 million jobs that the economy needs as it struggles to recover. Heritage Foundation tax policy expert Curtis Dubay details a replacement for the death tax, and explains why Congress must kill the death tax—now. View Article - Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:09:00 -0400 The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act would likely lead to the same conditions that caused the housing bubble of a few years ago. View Article - Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:00:00 -0400
|
|
|
Looking for more great sites?
|
|
May I suggest the following....
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's time to return our State and our Nation to that “More Prefect Union” |
|
|
|
By: Brian Miller Tuesday, September 15, 2009 www.meatandpotatoes.org |
|
|
From time to time, it is necessary to step out from behind the blogosphere at address our representatives face to face. The issue of State Sovereignty is one of those issues. On Tuesday September 15the the Ohio Senate State & Local Government Committee herd testimony in favor of SCR13 (Ohio State Sovereignty). Testimony lasted well over an hour and a half, with excellent testimony, from many speakers far better then I. Below is my contribution to the effort:
|
Chairman Hughes, members of the State and Local Government Committee, I appreciate the opportunity to testify in support of SCR 13. I would also like to thank the bill’s sponsor, Senator Grendell, for allowing me this opportunity to encourage the passage of this important legislation at such a critical time in our nation’s history.
Like many concerned citizens I have watched the struggle you have all faced as our economy has faltered. Each of you fought a fierce battle this summer to balance the budget; all the while the Federal Government has sought new taxes, printed fiat money and shown no concern for the growing downward pressure it has placed on you.
I could take my time to list numerous items in the budget worthy of trimming, to keep it balanced, but that would ignore the larger problem we all know exists. Dare I use the cliché; the Elephant in the room.
The Federal Government is literally sucking up the vast majority of Ohioan’s tax dollars, and retuning a fraction back, with strings attached to massive financial anchors that threaten to sink Ohio. Adding insult to injury, we as Ohioan’s watch in horror while our hard earned tax dollars are instead passed on to states like California and New York. States, with far less responsible Governments, who have squandered more money than they even plan to take in, on everything from harboring and lavishly providing for illegal aliens to saving some inane smelt fish.
One must ask just how we have arrived as such a dysfunctional state of affairs before a true and just answer can be reached.
The continual push and pull for power between the States and the Federal government has existed since the drafting of the United States Constitution. From 1787 to 1937 the belief in State Sovereignty was supported and endorsed by the Supreme Court as constitutional mandate. The concept of “Dual Federalism” where dual sovereign governments coexist with States having powers not specifically delegated, or, dare I say, loaned to the Federal Government, is the form Benjamin Franklin envisioned, and so eloquently called a “More Perfect Union”. Franklin later stated upon the signing of the constitution “You have your republic…if you can keep it”. Even then, he saw the potential of this balance to be upset by complacency, brute legislative force, or worse yet, both.
In the depression era of the late1930’s Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt, along with a willing Congress, passed radical new legislation that fundamentally changed the scope and range of the Federal Government, under the guise of an emergency. Dose any of this sound frillier? These changes nearly erased the concept of “Dual Federalism” from the judicial record. This act of judicially gagging State sovereignty under a new interpretation of both the 10th amendment and the Supremacy Clause has emboldened Congress and relegated State governments to a role of federal administrator. Few times has the highest court in the landed sided with the States, most recently was Gregory v. Ashcroft 501 U.S. 542 (1991) where the court clearly ruled that States can not be forced to help administer federal programs. The open loop hole is that while States have a choice in their legislation, the court noted that it is constitutional for Congress to encourage State legislation by attaching conditions to the receipt of federal funds. In other words, federally mandated and court approved extortion.
Ohio and her sister states have sat idle while lager and larger sums of wealth have been allowed to be confiscated in the form of taxes, only to have those funds used to twist the arms our legislators, and in essence, subvert our State representation and silence the will of it’s people. Could we conclude that this monopoly of tax dollars going to one entity should be broken up into 50 State collectors in order to restore the balance intended by our founding fathers? Has the time come for Ohio and her sister States to amend the Constitution so as to save themselves before they cease to exist, except in name alone? The States have a constitutional mechanism for this, a check and balance within our union that, until now, has never been needed.
Imagine for a moment that instead of getting 15 cents on the dollar from the federal government, with strings attached far exceeding it’s monetary value, Ohio would double it’s rate of income tax. I would be thrilled to pay an additional 10% to this State rather than 35% to a federal bureaucracy that is both unreachable and nonresponsive to my needs. Today’s concentrated power of lobbyists is also kept far better in check when the true big money game is decentralized. Entertain for a moment the economic and tax revenue explosion that would come from nearly 30% of ones income suddenly available to spend, or invest in new business ventures. As power is shifted locally, imagine the job opportunities for Ohioans. Ask yourself, has the time come for a State’s Bill of Rights, containing amendments to the United States Constitution that will move the republic in this logical direction? A reassertion of State Sovereignty, along with a majority of the States at this time, is a prudent measure to take. Should the time come that these questions become viable courses of action, we will be prepared.
States have not seen so much red ink since the great depression, however today it is not the economy so much as federal mandates like Cap and Trade, National Healthcare Reform and many more. These mandates fail to provide adequate funding, and pass massive costs on to our State threatening our solvency. How can Ohioans survive, when the Federal Government decides what plants to close? When they decide who gets to keep their job, and who loses their job? When they decide how much of, and what resources our people can and cannot harvest? We lay off our State’s Government workers, and the Federal Government adds workers. We cut our services, and they add services. We lose our sovereignty, and they give us more debt.
As one of the most populous states in the union, Ohio’s leadership role within our republic is a matter of record. Sadly, on the issue of State sovereignty, we have remained silent. Alaska, Idaho, Louisiana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma and Tennessee have all passed similar legislation with bills pending in over twenty other states. SCR 13 contains no saber rattling of succession, only a common sense reminder and reaffirmation of Constitutional law. I can assure this committee that Ohio is not alone in its desire to restore it’s true and proper balance with its sovereignty and governmental responsibility. It is our civic duty, both as Ohioans and Americans, to formally remind the federal government of its role within our republic. Each of you know that Government functions best when it is close to home, where it can be both accountable and mindful of the unique regional and local needs it serves. To that end I respectfully request your support for SCR 13, and begin to return our State and our Nation to that “More Prefect Union”. Thank you. |
If you would like to listen to the speech go ahead, I will warn you that this was the first time I have ever done anything like this, and my speech was less the perfect.
Taping of proceeding is only permitted with consent from the Committee chair. I did receive permission, and recorded this with a low grade pocket recorder, so excuse the quality.
Read SRC 13
|
|
|
|
**UPDATE** |
|
This bill was passed in the Ohio Senate and is now in committe for the Ohio House of Representitves. | |
|
|
|

|
| 1 - There is no liberal bias in the media |
|
| 2 - Separation of Church and State |
|
| 3 - Banning partial birth abortions is an assault on a woman's right to choose |
|
| 4 - The Outsourcing of American Jobs |
|
| 5 - The Creation of Green Jobs |
|
| 6 - Same Sex Marriage |
|
| 7 - Rasing Taxes Equals more government funds |
|
| 8 - The Supreme Court should keep International Courts in mind |
|
| 9 - America must be humble to the international community |
|
| 10 - Government Knows Best |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My Top Blog Picks:
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
We are an independent group of thinkers, who are neither Democrats nor Republicans, but believe in right and wrong. It’s time to clear all the crazy stuff from our lives, and get down to just the Meat and Potatoes of today’s issues. Join us, and invite your friends to sit down at your table and discuss with us. Site Map | |
| |
|